Grattan Institute calls for rethinking infrastructure funding to end pork barrel | The mail


news, latest news,

Federal funding for road and rail projects still goes more to marginal seats than safe seats, according to a report by the independent Grattan Institute, amid calls for reform of funding laws. There are also concerns that federal funding is going to minor projects, like “roundabouts, overpasses and parking lots” instead of “projects of national significance.” The report notes that secure seats in Victoria received less funding for projects than fringe seats in New South Wales or Queensland, and in the last election only one of the Coalition’s 71 transport pledges valued at $100 million or more had a business case approved by Infrastructure Australia. , while for Labor it was two out of 61 projects. received $83 million from the Federal Urban Congestion Fund, while the Coalition’s Average Safe Headquarters received $64 million and the Average Safe Headquarters $34 million.” That said, the money for road safety improvements , and in particular the Roads to Recovery and Black Spot programs, was more bipartisan and focused more on regional and rural areas When announcing major projects, over $100 million, the federal government should also release an assessment of Infrastructure Australia, including its business case, report author Marion Terrill said in a press release, to improve transparency, while focusing less on pets its projects. “Politicians who insist on doing pork are wasting taxpayers’ money, and the biggest losers are people who live in safe seats or states with few fringe voters,” they write. “Politicians are not supposed to spend public money to promote their private interests, including their private political advantage. Avoiding such conflicts of interest would be easier if the federal government stuck to its national role and did due diligence before spending public money.” Ballarat City Mayor Daniel Moloney, who is also chairman of Regional Capitals Australia, said growing cities needed support “regardless of politics “, while calling for a national population strategy. “All councils want to see a logical, needs-based approach,” he said. “In the case of Ballarat, we are a rapidly growing city with 2,500 to 3,000 people per year, and we need the infrastructure to reflect that.” Many of these decisions are difficult to make without a clear demographic policy that determines the level of international immigration. and internal migration out of capitals and into regional areas, and having this population framework supported by a strong infrastructure strategy is the way forward. The committee’s chief executive for Ballarat, Michael Poulton, said any infrastructure funding needed to be focused on the long term. “It must be strategically aligned with population settlement and growth, and generally the electoral cycle is a short-term process – planning and major infrastructure investments must be long-term oriented,” he said. -he declares. Rapid regional rail opportunities are about long-term generational change in how we live and move in our state, and with a short-term focus on elections, those outcomes are less likely. “The full report and analysis is available online. Have you subscribed to the Courier’s variety of informational emails? You can sign up below and make sure you’re up to date with everything happening in Ballarat.




Comments are closed.